| MC4WP | New Post Automatic XML Backup by | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress | New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.5k | 1 |
| Active installs | 1,000,000+ | 10+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email edges out MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has the larger user base (1,497 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress's 1,497-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress audit • New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email audit
| Keyword | MC4WP | New Post Automatic XML Backup by |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #76 | Not ranked |
| form | #89 | Not ranked |
| custom form | #130 | Not ranked |
New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress (4.8★ from 1,497 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,497 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,497 reviews). New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress and New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from New Post Automatic XML Backup by Email" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.