Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress | @MediaPost – Formulário de cadastro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 1.5k | 0 |
| Active installs | 1,000,000+ | 20+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
On the measured data here, MC4WP leads on more dimensions (2 vs 0). Pick @MediaPost if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Built only from the WordPress Plugin Directory listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress audit • @MediaPost – Formulário de cadastro audit
| Keyword | MC4WP | @MediaPost – Formulário de cadastro |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #100 | Not ranked |
| form | #111 | Not ranked |
| custom form | #158 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (1,497 vs 0).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the WordPress Plugin Directory data. What it can show: MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has 1,497 published reviews; @MediaPost – Formulário de cadastro has 0 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress and @MediaPost – Formulário de cadastro both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from @MediaPost – Formulário de cadastro" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.