| LuckyWP Table of Contents | Table Of Contents Block | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LuckyWP Table of Contents | Table Of Contents Block |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 885 | 7 |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 10,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, LuckyWP Table of Contents is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Table Of Contents Block's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
LuckyWP Table of Contents has the larger user base (885 reviews vs 7), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Table Of Contents Block's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to LuckyWP Table of Contents; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Table Of Contents Block's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuckyWP Table of Contents's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LuckyWP Table of Contents audit • Table Of Contents Block audit
| Keyword | LuckyWP Table of Contents | Table Of Contents Block |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #425 | #898 |
No tracked changes.
LuckyWP Table of Contents has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 885 reviews) compared to Table Of Contents Block (4.3★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
LuckyWP Table of Contents holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. LuckyWP Table of Contents has the deeper published review base (885 vs 7), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
LuckyWP Table of Contents typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (885 reviews). Table Of Contents Block typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LuckyWP Table of Contents and Table Of Contents Block both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Table Of Contents Block" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.