User Menus – Nav Menu Visibility vs LuckyWP ACF Menu Field

LuckyWP ACF Menu Field and User Menus – Nav Menu Visibility are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. User Menus – Nav Menu Visibility has the larger user base (1,271 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. LuckyWP ACF Menu Field's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: LuckyWP ACF Menu Field audit • User Menus – Nav Menu Visibility audit

• Browse the wordpress compare hub
• Browse all wordpress apps
• Compare metrics glossary