Loading content…
Max Mega Menu vs LuckyWP ACF Menu Field
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Metric | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field | Max Mega Menu |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 19 | ★ 858 |
| Active installs | — | 300,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field edges out Max Mega Menu on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Max Mega Menu has the larger user base (858 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. LuckyWP ACF Menu Field's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LuckyWP ACF Menu Field; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Max Mega Menu's 858-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuckyWP ACF Menu Field's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LuckyWP ACF Menu Field audit • Max Mega Menu audit
| Keyword | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field | Max Mega Menu |
|---|---|---|
| form builder | Not ranked | #243 |
| custom form | Not ranked | #499 |
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 19 reviews) compared to Max Mega Menu (4.8★ from 858 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LuckyWP ACF Menu Field fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Max Mega Menu is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Max Mega Menu has more onboarding documentation maturity (858 reviews vs 19), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (19 reviews). Max Mega Menu aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (858 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LuckyWP ACF Menu Field and Max Mega Menu both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LuckyWP ACF Menu Field" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.