Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LS Stock Portfolio | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LS Stock Portfolio | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 5.9k |
| Active installs | 10+ | 400,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs LS Stock Portfolio's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements has the larger user base (5,923 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. LS Stock Portfolio's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LS Stock Portfolio's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LS Stock Portfolio audit • Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements audit
| Keyword | LS Stock Portfolio | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements |
|---|---|---|
| faq | Not ranked | #7 |
| live support | Not ranked | #32 |
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LS Stock Portfolio fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,923 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LS Stock Portfolio typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,923 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LS Stock Portfolio and Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LS Stock Portfolio" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
