Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer | WP Branding | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer | WP Branding |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.1k | 3 |
| Active installs | 200,000+ | 80+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
WP Branding edges out LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer has the larger user base (1,075 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WP Branding's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WP Branding; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer's 1,075-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP Branding's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer audit • WP Branding audit
| Keyword | LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer | WP Branding |
|---|---|---|
| custom form | #72 | Not ranked |
| forms | #330 | Not ranked |
| form | #386 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
WP Branding has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer (4.8★ from 1,075 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WP Branding holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer has the deeper published review base (1,075 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,075 reviews). WP Branding typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer and WP Branding both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Branding" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
