Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer | Passwordless Login | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer | Passwordless Login |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.1k | 10 |
| Active installs | 200,000+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Passwordless Login edges out LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer has the larger user base (1,074 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Passwordless Login's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Passwordless Login; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer's 1,074-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Passwordless Login's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer audit • Passwordless Login audit
| Keyword | LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer | Passwordless Login |
|---|---|---|
| custom form | #50 | #882 |
| forms | #258 | #982 |
Passwordless Login has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 10 reviews) compared to LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer (4.8★ from 1,074 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Passwordless Login is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,074 reviews vs 10), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,074 reviews). Passwordless Login aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (10 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LoginPress | wp-login Custom Login Page Customizer and Passwordless Login both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Passwordless Login" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
