Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Login Site Icon | WP Fail2Ban Redux | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Login Site Icon | WP Fail2Ban Redux |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 15 |
| Active installs | 200+ | 7,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Login Site Icon and WP Fail2Ban Redux are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Login Site Icon audit • WP Fail2Ban Redux audit
No tracked changes.
Login Site Icon (5.0★, 2 reviews) and WP Fail2Ban Redux (5.0★, 15 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. WP Fail2Ban Redux does carry the larger published review base (15 vs 2). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. WP Fail2Ban Redux has the deeper published review base (15 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Login Site Icon typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). WP Fail2Ban Redux typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Login Site Icon and WP Fail2Ban Redux both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Login Site Icon" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
