Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Limit Login Attempts | Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Limit Login Attempts | Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 202 | 4 |
| Active installs | 300,000+ | 9,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Limit Login Attempts's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Limit Login Attempts has the larger user base (202 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Limit Login Attempts's 202-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Limit Login Attempts audit • Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email audit
| Keyword | Limit Login Attempts | Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #850 |
| form | Not ranked | #900 |
Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Limit Login Attempts (4.6★ from 202 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Limit Login Attempts has the deeper published review base (202 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Limit Login Attempts typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (202 reviews). Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Limit Login Attempts and Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Two Factor (2FA) Authentication via Email" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
