Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Manage 301 redirects, track 404 errors, and improve your site. No knowledge of Apache or Nginx required.
| JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable | Redirection | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
No setup required - simply activate to force HTTP URLs to HTTPS using native WordPress filters and permanent redirects for best SEO.
| Metric | JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable | Redirection |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 13 | ★ 689 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs Redirection's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Redirection has the larger user base (689 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Redirection's 689-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable audit • Redirection audit
JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 13 reviews) compared to Redirection (4.4★ from 689 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Redirection is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Redirection has more onboarding documentation maturity (689 reviews vs 13), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (13 reviews). Redirection aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (689 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable and Redirection both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from JSM Force HTTP to HTTPS / SSL – No Setup, Fast and Reliable" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.