Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS vs Pantheon Advanced Page Cache

Pantheon Advanced Page Cache edges out Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS has the larger user base (600 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Pantheon Advanced Page Cache's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Pantheon Advanced Page Cache; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS's 600-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Pantheon Advanced Page Cache's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS audit • Pantheon Advanced Page Cache audit

• Browse the wordpress compare hub
• Browse all wordpress apps
• Compare metrics glossary