Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Iota Pay Per Content | PWD WP Favicon | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Iota Pay Per Content | PWD WP Favicon |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 5 |
| Active installs | — | 800+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, PWD WP Favicon is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs Iota Pay Per Content's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PWD WP Favicon; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Iota Pay Per Content's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PWD WP Favicon's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Iota Pay Per Content audit • PWD WP Favicon audit
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Iota Pay Per Content fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; PWD WP Favicon is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. PWD WP Favicon has more onboarding documentation maturity (5 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Iota Pay Per Content typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). PWD WP Favicon aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (5 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Iota Pay Per Content and PWD WP Favicon both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Iota Pay Per Content" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
