Insert Pages vs PDF.js Viewer
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Insert Pages
Insert Pages lets you embed any WordPress content (e.g., pages, posts, custom post types) into other WordPress content using the Shortcode API.
Shopify
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Insert Pages lets you embed any WordPress content (e.g., pages, posts, custom post types) into other WordPress content using the Shortcode API.
| Metric | Insert Pages | PDF.js Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 71 | 53 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Insert Pages is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.8★ vs PDF.js Viewer's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Insert Pages; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PDF.js Viewer's 53-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Insert Pages's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Insert Pages audit • PDF.js Viewer audit
Insert Pages has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 71 reviews) compared to PDF.js Viewer (4.4★ from 53 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Insert Pages fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; PDF.js Viewer is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Insert Pages has more onboarding documentation maturity (71 reviews vs 53), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Insert Pages typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (71 reviews). PDF.js Viewer aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (53 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Insert Pages and PDF.js Viewer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PDF.js Viewer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.