Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| InPost Gallery | Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | InPost Gallery | Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 18 | ★ 265 |
| Active installs | 800+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs InPost Gallery's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv has the larger user base (265 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. InPost Gallery's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — InPost Gallery's 18-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: InPost Gallery audit • Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv audit
Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 265 reviews) compared to InPost Gallery (4.0★ from 18 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. InPost Gallery fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv has more onboarding documentation maturity (265 reviews vs 18), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
InPost Gallery typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (18 reviews). Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (265 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. InPost Gallery and Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from InPost Gallery" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
