Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Infobox | WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Infobox | WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 35 |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs Infobox's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Infobox's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Infobox audit • WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress audit
| Keyword | Infobox | WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #886 | Not ranked |
WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 35 reviews) compared to Infobox (3.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Infobox fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress has more onboarding documentation maturity (35 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Infobox typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3 reviews). WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (35 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Infobox and WindPress – Tailwind CSS integration for WordPress both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Infobox" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
