Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Images Optimize and Upload CF7 | WP HTTP Compression | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Images Optimize and Upload CF7 | WP HTTP Compression |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 2.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 14 | 8 |
| Active installs | 600+ | 400+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Images Optimize and Upload CF7 is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.8★ vs WP HTTP Compression's 2.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Images Optimize and Upload CF7; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP HTTP Compression's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Images Optimize and Upload CF7's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Images Optimize and Upload CF7 audit • WP HTTP Compression audit
| Keyword | Images Optimize and Upload CF7 | WP HTTP Compression |
|---|---|---|
| contact | #479 | Not ranked |
| contact form | #513 | Not ranked |
| feedback form | #580 | Not ranked |
Images Optimize and Upload CF7 has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 14 reviews) compared to WP HTTP Compression (2.3★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Images Optimize and Upload CF7 holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 2.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Images Optimize and Upload CF7 has the deeper published review base (14 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Images Optimize and Upload CF7 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (14 reviews). WP HTTP Compression typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Images Optimize and Upload CF7 and WP HTTP Compression both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP HTTP Compression" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
