Hyper Cache vs Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS

Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS edges out Hyper Cache on rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS has the larger user base (600 reviews vs 82), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Hyper Cache's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Hyper Cache's 82-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: Hyper Cache audit • Jetpack Boost – Website Speed, Performance and Critical CSS audit

• Browse the wordpress compare hub
• Browse all wordpress apps
• Compare metrics glossary