Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker | Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker | Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 144 | 17 |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | 600+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao edges out HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker has the larger user base (144 reviews vs 17), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker's 144-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker audit • Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao audit
| Keyword | HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker | Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | #352 | Not ranked |
| forms | #366 | Not ranked |
| form | #436 | Not ranked |
| online form | Not ranked | #852 |
| online forms | Not ranked | #860 |
No tracked changes.
Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 17 reviews) compared to HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker (4.8★ from 144 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker has the deeper published review base (144 vs 17), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (144 reviews). Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (17 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker and Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Track, Analyze & Optimize by WP Tao" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
