Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | GravityWP – Count | WP Share Simple |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 13 | 1 |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 10+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
The data on this page doesn't separate GravityWP and WP Share Simple on rating, pricing, languages, category rank or listed features. Compare the tables below against your own requirements.
Built only from the WordPress Plugin Directory listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: GravityWP – Count audit • WP Share Simple audit
| Keyword | GravityWP – Count | WP Share Simple |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #701 | Not ranked |
GravityWP – Count (5.0★, 13 reviews) and WP Share Simple (5.0★, 1 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. GravityWP – Count does carry the larger published review base (13 vs 1). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; GravityWP – Count has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (13 vs 1).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the WordPress Plugin Directory data. What it can show: GravityWP – Count has 13 published reviews; WP Share Simple has 1 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. GravityWP – Count and WP Share Simple both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Share Simple" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.