Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector | Gravity PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector | Gravity PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 10 | ★ 318 |
| Active installs | 4,000+ | 20,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Gravity PDF edges out Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Gravity PDF has the larger user base (318 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Gravity PDF; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gravity PDF's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector audit • Gravity PDF audit
| Keyword | Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector | Gravity PDF |
|---|---|---|
| online forms | Not ranked | #90 |
| forms | Not ranked | #243 |
| online form | Not ranked | #372 |
Gravity PDF has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 318 reviews) compared to Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector (4.7★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Gravity PDF holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Gravity PDF has the deeper published review base (318 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). Gravity PDF typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (318 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector and Gravity PDF both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gravity Forms CSS Ready Class Selector" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.