Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| XML Sitemap Generator for Google | Head Meta Data | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | XML Sitemap Generator for Google | Head Meta Data |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 2.2k | 19 |
| Active installs | 1,000,000+ | 10,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
XML Sitemap Generator for Google and Head Meta Data are evenly matched on rating (4.8★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
XML Sitemap Generator for Google has the larger user base (2,233 reviews vs 19), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Head Meta Data's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: XML Sitemap Generator for Google audit • Head Meta Data audit
| Keyword | XML Sitemap Generator for Google | Head Meta Data |
|---|---|---|
| live support | #323 | #778 |
No tracked changes.
XML Sitemap Generator for Google (4.8★, 2,233 reviews) and Head Meta Data (4.8★, 19 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.8★. XML Sitemap Generator for Google does carry the larger published review base (2,233 vs 19). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. XML Sitemap Generator for Google has the deeper published review base (2,233 vs 19), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
XML Sitemap Generator for Google typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2,233 reviews). Head Meta Data typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (19 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. XML Sitemap Generator for Google and Head Meta Data both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Head Meta Data" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
