Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Maps Widget for Google Maps | MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Maps Widget for Google Maps | MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 512 | 31 |
| Active installs | 30,000+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Maps Widget for Google Maps and MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps are evenly matched on rating (4.6★ vs 4.5★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Maps Widget for Google Maps has the larger user base (512 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Maps Widget for Google Maps audit • MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps audit
| Keyword | Maps Widget for Google Maps | MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps |
|---|---|---|
| chat bot | Not ranked | #132 |
| ai agent | Not ranked | #355 |
| live chat | Not ranked | #370 |
| live support | #495 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Maps Widget for Google Maps (4.6★, 512 reviews) and MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps (4.5★, 31 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Maps Widget for Google Maps fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Maps Widget for Google Maps has more onboarding documentation maturity (512 reviews vs 31), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Maps Widget for Google Maps typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (512 reviews). MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (31 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Maps Widget for Google Maps and MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MapSVG – Vector maps, Image maps, Google Maps" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.