Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Attributes User Access | Google Authenticator | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Attributes User Access | Google Authenticator |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 135 |
| Active installs | 20+ | 20,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Attributes User Access is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Google Authenticator's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Google Authenticator has the larger user base (135 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Attributes User Access's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Attributes User Access; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Authenticator's 135-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Attributes User Access's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Attributes User Access audit • Google Authenticator audit
| Keyword | Attributes User Access | Google Authenticator |
|---|---|---|
| feedback form | #991 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Attributes User Access has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Google Authenticator (4.3★ from 135 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Attributes User Access holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Google Authenticator has the deeper published review base (135 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Attributes User Access typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Google Authenticator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (135 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Attributes User Access and Google Authenticator both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Attributes User Access" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
