CSS vs Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms

CSS Email Obfuscator edges out Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to CSS Email Obfuscator; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CSS Email Obfuscator's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, CSS Email Obfuscator or Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms?

CSS Email Obfuscator has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms (4.7★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose CSS Email Obfuscator or Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms?

CSS Email Obfuscator holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, CSS Email Obfuscator or Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms has the deeper published review base (7 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

CSS Email Obfuscator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between CSS Email Obfuscator and Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms?

Migration support varies by app and category. CSS Email Obfuscator and Address Autocomplete via Google for Gravity Forms both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CSS Email Obfuscator" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.