Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| FV Clone Screen Options | Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | FV Clone Screen Options | Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 11 | ★ 1.9k |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks edges out FV Clone Screen Options on rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks has the larger user base (1,870 reviews vs 11), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. FV Clone Screen Options's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — FV Clone Screen Options's 11-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FV Clone Screen Options audit • Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks audit
| Keyword | FV Clone Screen Options | Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks |
|---|---|---|
| online form | Not ranked | #18 |
| online forms | Not ranked | #21 |
| faq | Not ranked | #34 |
No tracked changes.
Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 1,870 reviews) compared to FV Clone Screen Options (4.6★ from 11 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks has the deeper published review base (1,870 vs 11), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
FV Clone Screen Options typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,870 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FV Clone Screen Options and Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from FV Clone Screen Options" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
