Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Clicky Frontend Stats | Head, Footer and Post Injections | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Clicky Frontend Stats | Head, Footer and Post Injections |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 735 |
| Active installs | — | 300,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Head, Footer and Post Injections is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs Clicky Frontend Stats's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Head, Footer and Post Injections has the larger user base (735 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Clicky Frontend Stats's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Head, Footer and Post Injections; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Clicky Frontend Stats's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Head, Footer and Post Injections's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Clicky Frontend Stats audit • Head, Footer and Post Injections audit
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Clicky Frontend Stats fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Head, Footer and Post Injections is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Head, Footer and Post Injections has more onboarding documentation maturity (735 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Clicky Frontend Stats typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Head, Footer and Post Injections aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (735 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Clicky Frontend Stats and Head, Footer and Post Injections both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Clicky Frontend Stats" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
