Loading content…
| Metric | Forms: 3rd-Party Integration | MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 31 | ★ 1.5k |
| Active installs | — | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Forms: 3rd-Party Integration edges out MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has the larger user base (1,492 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Forms: 3rd-Party Integration's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Forms: 3rd-Party Integration; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress's 1,492-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Forms: 3rd-Party Integration's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Forms: 3rd-Party Integration audit • MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress audit
| Keyword | Forms | MC4WP |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #74 |
| form | Not ranked | #88 |
| custom form | Not ranked | #130 |
Forms: 3rd-Party Integration has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 31 reviews) compared to MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress (4.8★ from 1,492 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Forms: 3rd-Party Integration fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,492 reviews vs 31), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Forms: 3rd-Party Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (31 reviews). MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1,492 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Forms: 3rd-Party Integration and MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Forms: 3rd-Party Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
