Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Flickr-stream | Flickr Viewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Flickr-stream | Flickr Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 3 |
| Active installs | 90+ | 40+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Flickr-stream edges out Flickr Viewer on rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Flickr-stream; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Flickr Viewer's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Flickr-stream's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Flickr-stream audit • Flickr Viewer audit
Flickr-stream has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 2 reviews) compared to Flickr Viewer (4.3★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Flickr-stream holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Flickr Viewer has the deeper published review base (3 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Flickr-stream typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Flickr Viewer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Flickr-stream and Flickr Viewer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Flickr-stream" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
