Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries vs Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe

Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe edges out Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries has the larger user base (638 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries's 638-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries or Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe?

Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries (4.7★ from 638 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries or Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe?

Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries or Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries has the deeper published review base (638 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (638 reviews). Static Posts for Twitter – Embed x.com Tweets without an iframe typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.