Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries vs Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent

Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent edges out Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries has the larger user base (638 reviews vs 21), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries's 638-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries or Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent?

Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 21 reviews) compared to Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries (4.7★ from 638 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries or Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent?

Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries or Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries has the deeper published review base (638 vs 21), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (638 reviews). Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (21 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.