Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Featured Image from URL (FIFU) | Protected Video | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Featured Image from URL (FIFU) | Protected Video |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 264 | 15 |
| Active installs | 60,000+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Protected Video edges out Featured Image from URL (FIFU) on rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Featured Image from URL (FIFU) has the larger user base (264 reviews vs 15), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Protected Video's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Protected Video; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Featured Image from URL (FIFU)'s 264-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Protected Video's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Featured Image from URL (FIFU) audit • Protected Video audit
| Keyword | Featured Image from URL (FIFU) | Protected Video |
|---|---|---|
| custom form | #682 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Protected Video has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 15 reviews) compared to Featured Image from URL (FIFU) (4.6★ from 264 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Protected Video holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Featured Image from URL (FIFU) has the deeper published review base (264 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Featured Image from URL (FIFU) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (264 reviews). Protected Video typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Featured Image from URL (FIFU) and Protected Video both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Protected Video" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
