Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| FAT Cooming Soon | Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | FAT Cooming Soon | Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 1.9k |
| Active installs | 100+ | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.7★ vs FAT Cooming Soon's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks has the larger user base (1,870 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. FAT Cooming Soon's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — FAT Cooming Soon's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FAT Cooming Soon audit • Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks audit
| Keyword | FAT Cooming Soon | Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks |
|---|---|---|
| online form | Not ranked | #18 |
| online forms | Not ranked | #21 |
| faq | Not ranked | #34 |
No tracked changes.
Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks has the deeper published review base (1,870 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
FAT Cooming Soon typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,870 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FAT Cooming Soon and Spectra Legacy – Gutenberg Blocks both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from FAT Cooming Soon" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
