| Extra User Details | Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Extra User Details | Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 10 | ★ 638 |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 20,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Extra User Details and Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.7★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries has the larger user base (638 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Extra User Details's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Extra User Details audit • Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries audit
| Keyword | Extra User Details | Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries |
|---|---|---|
| form builder | Not ranked | #784 |
| custom form | Not ranked | #977 |
Extra User Details (4.7★, 10 reviews) and Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries (4.7★, 638 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.7★. Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries does carry the larger published review base (638 vs 10). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries has the deeper published review base (638 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Extra User Details typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (638 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Extra User Details and Feed Them Social – Social Media Feeds, Video, and Photo Galleries both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Extra User Details" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.