Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| EWWW Image Optimizer | Translate WordPress with GTranslate | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Comprehensive image optimization that doesn't require a rocket science degree. Optimize images automatically for Faster Sites and Happy Visitors.
| Metric | EWWW Image Optimizer | Translate WordPress with GTranslate |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1.8k | ★ 4.9k |
| Active installs | — | 900,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Translate WordPress with GTranslate edges out EWWW Image Optimizer on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the larger user base (4,918 reviews vs 1,822), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. EWWW Image Optimizer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Translate WordPress with GTranslate; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — EWWW Image Optimizer's 1,822-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Translate WordPress with GTranslate's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: EWWW Image Optimizer audit • Translate WordPress with GTranslate audit
| Keyword | EWWW Image Optimizer | Translate WordPress with GTranslate |
|---|---|---|
| live chat | Not ranked | #15 |
| faq | Not ranked | #22 |
| customer service | Not ranked | #29 |
No description available.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,918 reviews) compared to EWWW Image Optimizer (4.8★ from 1,822 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. EWWW Image Optimizer fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Translate WordPress with GTranslate is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Translate WordPress with GTranslate has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,918 reviews vs 1,822), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
EWWW Image Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,822 reviews). Translate WordPress with GTranslate aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4,918 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. EWWW Image Optimizer and Translate WordPress with GTranslate both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from EWWW Image Optimizer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
