| En Spam | Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | En Spam | Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 7 | ★ 384 |
| Active installs | 500+ | 600,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening edges out En Spam on rating (4.2★ vs 4.1★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening has the larger user base (384 reviews vs 7), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. En Spam's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — En Spam's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: En Spam audit • Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening audit
| Keyword | En Spam | Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening |
|---|---|---|
| feedback form | Not ranked | #227 |
| online form | Not ranked | #290 |
| online forms | Not ranked | #297 |
| contact form | #743 | Not ranked |
| contact | #987 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 384 reviews) compared to En Spam (4.1★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening holds the higher average rating (4.2★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening has the deeper published review base (384 vs 7), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
En Spam typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (384 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. En Spam and Sucuri Security – Auditing, Malware Scanner and Security Hardening both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from En Spam" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
