| Ecomail | WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Ecomail | WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 281 |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 60,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.8★ vs Ecomail's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics has the larger user base (281 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Ecomail's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ecomail's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ecomail audit • WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics audit
| Keyword | Ecomail | WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| feedback form | Not ranked | #38 |
| survey | Not ranked | #90 |
| faq | Not ranked | #126 |
| contact | #710 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 281 reviews) compared to Ecomail (4.0★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics has the deeper published review base (281 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Ecomail typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (281 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ecomail and WP ULike – Like Buttons, Voting & Engagement Analytics both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ecomail" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
