Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 | HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 | HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 145 |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 10,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker edges out Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 on rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker has the larger user base (145 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 audit • HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker audit
| Keyword | Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 | HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | #83 | #352 |
| form | #156 | #436 |
| contact | #97 | #628 |
| forms | #396 | #366 |
HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 145 reviews) compared to Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 (4.5★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker has the deeper published review base (145 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (145 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7 and HandL UTM Grabber / Tracker both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Easy UTM tracking with contact form 7" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
