Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Social Sharing (by Danny) | WP Review Slider | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Social Sharing (by Danny) | WP Review Slider |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 68 | ★ 180 |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 6,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Social Sharing (by Danny) edges out WP Review Slider on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. WP Review Slider has the larger user base (180 reviews vs 68), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Social Sharing (by Danny)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Social Sharing (by Danny); mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP Review Slider's 180-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Social Sharing (by Danny)'s broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Social Sharing (by Danny) audit • WP Review Slider audit
| Keyword | Social Sharing (by Danny) | WP Review Slider |
|---|---|---|
| customer support | Not ranked | #274 |
| customer service | Not ranked | #429 |
Social Sharing (by Danny) has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 68 reviews) compared to WP Review Slider (4.8★ from 180 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Social Sharing (by Danny) fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; WP Review Slider is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP Review Slider has more onboarding documentation maturity (180 reviews vs 68), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Social Sharing (by Danny) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (68 reviews). WP Review Slider aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (180 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Social Sharing (by Danny) and WP Review Slider both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Social Sharing (by Danny)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
