Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Image Placeholders | WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Displays placeholders based on an image's dominant color while the image is loading.
| Metric | Image Placeholders | WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 4.2k |
| Active installs | — | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs Image Placeholders's 3.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin has the larger user base (4,207 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Image Placeholders's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Image Placeholders's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Image Placeholders audit • WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin audit
| Keyword | Image Placeholders | WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | Not ranked | #240 |
| contact | Not ranked | #248 |
| form builder | Not ranked | #413 |
WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,207 reviews) compared to Image Placeholders (3.5★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Image Placeholders fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,207 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Image Placeholders typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2 reviews). WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4,207 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Image Placeholders and WP Fastest Cache – WordPress Cache Plugin both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Image Placeholders" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
