Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Disqus Comment System | Localhost to IP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Disqus Comment System | Localhost to IP |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 219 | 6 |
| Active installs | 40,000+ | 10+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Localhost to IP is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs Disqus Comment System's 2.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Disqus Comment System has the larger user base (219 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Localhost to IP's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Localhost to IP; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Disqus Comment System's 219-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Localhost to IP's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Disqus Comment System audit • Localhost to IP audit
Localhost to IP has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 6 reviews) compared to Disqus Comment System (2.7★ from 219 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Disqus Comment System fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Localhost to IP is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Disqus Comment System has more onboarding documentation maturity (219 reviews vs 6), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Disqus Comment System typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (219 reviews). Localhost to IP aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (6 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Disqus Comment System and Localhost to IP both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Localhost to IP" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
