Disable Emojis (GDPR vs Encute — WordPress

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) vs Encute

Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly)

5.0·108reviews·60,000+installs

wordpress

Change

1. Listing metadata

Field-level data

	Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly)	Encute
Tagline	—	—
Description	1501 / 5000 chars30% used	2710 / 5000 chars54% used
Screenshots	—	—
Languages
Platforms	WordPress	WordPress
Developer	Ryan Hellyer	Mark Jaquith
Listed	—	—
Last updated	—	—

2. Categories & rankings

Shared categories on the same row · in-category position inline

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly)

Encute

Shared

At a glance

4 metrics · auto-computed

Feature comparison between Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) and Encute
Metric	Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly)	Encute
Rating	★ 5.0 ★	4.0 ★
Total reviews	★ 108	1
Active installs	60,000+	10+
Free plan	—	—

3. App details

Long-form description · keyword frequency

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly)

This plugin disables the WordPress emoji functionality, removing unnecessary code bloat that adds support for emojis in older browsers. What it does Removes the emoji detection script from wp_head and the admin Removes emoji styles from wp_print_styles and admin Removes emoji DNS prefetching, preventing connections to s.w.org Removes the wpemoji TinyMCE plugin Strips emoji CDN hostname from DNS prefetch hints Performance & Privacy Emojis will still display in modern browsers that have built-in support. This plugin simply removes the extra HTTP requests and JavaScript overhead for browsers that don’t need it. Additionally, it prevents DNS prefetching to WordPress.org’s emoji CDN, improving privacy. Note: Emoticons like :) will continue to work as expected. Requirements PHP 7.4+ WordPress 5.0+ GDPR compliancy This plugin does not send any data to external servers. It disables DNS prefetching of emojis within WordPress, which should ensure improved privacy. To determine if your site is GDPR compliant, please seek legal advice. I have done my best to ensure the plugin is 100% GDPR compliant, but I am not a lawyer so cannot guarantee anything. Architecture The plugin uses: Quality All code uses declare(strict_types=1) and follows PSR-12. The plugin runs the following tooling: PHP_CodeSniffer (run via composer phpcs) — sniffs for PSR-12 violations PHP-CS-Fixer (run via composer cs) — dry-run style check PHPStan at level 6 (run via composer phpstan) — static analysis

Top keywords

emoji6×2.56%
removes5×2.14%
dns4×1.71%
wordpress4×1.71%
browsers3×1.28%
composer3×1.28%
dns prefetching3×1.28%
emojis3×1.28%
gdpr3×1.28%
prefetching3×1.28%
privacy3×1.28%
run3×1.28%

Encute

Encute provides a fluent, declarative API for site owners to manipulate the scripts and styles that WordPress, themes, and plugins shove onto their site. Move things into the footer, defer loading, remove assets entirely. Or load scripts async, or as modules, or as nomodule! Here’s an example of how you could use the plugin: is_page('contact'); Script::get('contact-form-7')->keepIf($isContactPage)->footer()->defer(); Style::get('contact-form-7')->keepIf($isContactPage)->footer()->defer(); Style::get(['mediaelement', 'wp-mediaelement'])->footer()->defer(); Style::get('material-icons')->defer(); Script::get('jquery')->remove(); }); Wrapper Always run code in this wrapper: add_action(\CWS\Encute\Plugin::class, function (\CWS\Encute\Plugin $encute) { // Your code here. }); This wrapper will be a no-op if Encute is not available, and it will both wait for Encute to be available to run, and pass you Encute’s main class instance. Fluency Both Script::get() and Style::get() return an instance of themselves, as do all calls to their methods, so you can just chain your calls. Script static CWS\Encute\Script::get(string $handle): CWS\Encute\Script — get a Script instance for that handle. CWS\Encute\Script::module(): CWS\Encute\Script — make the script a module. CWS\Encute\Script::noModule(): CWS\Encute\Script — make the script nomodule. CWS\Encute\Script::footer(): CWS\Encute\Script — send the script to the footer (along with its entire dependency family). CWS\Encute\Script::async(): CWS\Encute\Script — make the script async. CWS\Encute\Script::defer(): CWS\Encute\Script — make the script defer. CWS\Encute\Script::remove(): CWS\Encute\Script — remove the script. CWS\Encute\Script::removeIf(callable $callback): CWS\Encute\Script — remove the script if the callback resolves as true. CWS\Encute\Script::keepIf(callable $callback): CWS\Encute\Script — keep the script if the callback resolves as true (else remove it). Style static CWS\Encute\Style::get(string $handle): CWS\Encute\Style — get a Style instance for that handle. CWS\Encute\Style::footer(): CWS\Encute\Style — send the style to the footer (along with its entire dependency family). CWS\Encute\Style::defer(): CWS\Encute\Style — defer the style’s loading. CWS\Encute\Style::remove(): CWS\Encute\Style — remove the style. CWS\Encute\Style::removeIf(callable $callback): CWS\Encute\Style — remove the style if the callback resolves as true. CWS\Encute\Style::keepIf(callable $callback): CWS\Encute\Style — keep the style if the callback resolves as true (else remove it).

Top keywords

encute37×9.18%
cws32×7.94%

Frequently asked

Common questions about this comparison

Which has better reviews, Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) or Encute?

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 108 reviews) compared to Encute (4.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) or Encute?

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) or Encute?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) has the deeper published review base (108 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (108 reviews). Encute typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) and Encute?

Migration support varies by app and category. Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) and Encute both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Encute" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) vs Encute

Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly)

1. Listing metadata

2. Categories & rankings

Encute

At a glance

AppRanks verdict

3. App details

Frequently asked

Which has better reviews, Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) or Encute?

Should I choose Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) or Encute?

Which is faster to set up, Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) or Encute?

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Can I migrate data between Disable Emojis (GDPR friendly) and Encute?

See full keyword rankings, install trends, and weekly alerts

More popular comparisons