Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Custom Posts Per Page | Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Custom Posts Per Page | Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 12 | 0 |
| Active installs | 800+ | 700+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Custom Posts Per Page is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.8★ vs Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Custom Posts Per Page; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Custom Posts Per Page's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Custom Posts Per Page audit • Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded audit
No tracked changes.
Custom Posts Per Page holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Custom Posts Per Page has the deeper published review base (12 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Custom Posts Per Page typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Custom Posts Per Page and Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Custom Posts Per Page Reloaded" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
