Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Custom Post Type Permalinks | Restore Link Title Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Custom Post Type Permalinks | Restore Link Title Field |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 71 | 21 |
| Active installs | 200,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Restore Link Title Field edges out Custom Post Type Permalinks on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Restore Link Title Field; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Custom Post Type Permalinks's 71-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Restore Link Title Field's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Custom Post Type Permalinks audit • Restore Link Title Field audit
Restore Link Title Field has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 21 reviews) compared to Custom Post Type Permalinks (4.8★ from 71 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Custom Post Type Permalinks fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Restore Link Title Field is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Custom Post Type Permalinks has more onboarding documentation maturity (71 reviews vs 21), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Custom Post Type Permalinks typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (71 reviews). Restore Link Title Field aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (21 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Custom Post Type Permalinks and Restore Link Title Field both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Restore Link Title Field" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
