Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Custom Meta Widget | Memory Usage Bar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Custom Meta Widget | Memory Usage Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 23 | 4 |
| Active installs | 7,000+ | 300+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Custom Meta Widget is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs Memory Usage Bar's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Custom Meta Widget; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Memory Usage Bar's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Custom Meta Widget's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Custom Meta Widget audit • Memory Usage Bar audit
Custom Meta Widget has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 23 reviews) compared to Memory Usage Bar (3.8★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Custom Meta Widget fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Memory Usage Bar is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Custom Meta Widget has more onboarding documentation maturity (23 reviews vs 4), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Custom Meta Widget typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (23 reviews). Memory Usage Bar aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Custom Meta Widget and Memory Usage Bar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Memory Usage Bar" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
