Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) | Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) | Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 6.1k |
| Active installs | 4,000+ | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) edges out Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN has the larger user base (6,051 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg)'s smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg); mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN's 6,051-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) audit • Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN audit
| Keyword | Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) | Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN |
|---|---|---|
| live support | #341 | #389 |
No tracked changes.
Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN (4.8★ from 6,051 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN has the deeper published review base (6,051 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (6,051 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg) and Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Custom iFrame – Embed PDFs, Videos, and External Content in WordPress (Elementor & Gutenberg)" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.