Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Custom Fields Shortcodes | WYSIWYG Inline Code Command | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Custom Fields Shortcodes | WYSIWYG Inline Code Command |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 7 |
| Active installs | 100+ | 100+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Custom Fields Shortcodes edges out WYSIWYG Inline Code Command on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Custom Fields Shortcodes; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WYSIWYG Inline Code Command's 7-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Custom Fields Shortcodes's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Custom Fields Shortcodes audit • WYSIWYG Inline Code Command audit
Custom Fields Shortcodes has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to WYSIWYG Inline Code Command (4.7★ from 7 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Custom Fields Shortcodes holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. WYSIWYG Inline Code Command has the deeper published review base (7 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Custom Fields Shortcodes typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). WYSIWYG Inline Code Command typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Custom Fields Shortcodes and WYSIWYG Inline Code Command both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Custom Fields Shortcodes" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
