Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| CSS File Selector | Post Type Switcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | CSS File Selector | Post Type Switcher |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 252 |
| Active installs | 30+ | 200,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
CSS File Selector edges out Post Type Switcher on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Post Type Switcher has the larger user base (252 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CSS File Selector's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to CSS File Selector; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Post Type Switcher's 252-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CSS File Selector's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CSS File Selector audit • Post Type Switcher audit
No tracked changes.
CSS File Selector has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Post Type Switcher (4.8★ from 252 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. CSS File Selector fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Post Type Switcher is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Post Type Switcher has more onboarding documentation maturity (252 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
CSS File Selector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3 reviews). Post Type Switcher aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (252 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CSS File Selector and Post Type Switcher both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CSS File Selector" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
