| Cresta Social Share Counter | Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Cresta Social Share Counter | Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 55 | 3 |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 10+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles edges out Cresta Social Share Counter on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cresta Social Share Counter's 55-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cresta Social Share Counter audit • Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles audit
Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Cresta Social Share Counter (4.8★ from 55 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Cresta Social Share Counter has the deeper published review base (55 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cresta Social Share Counter typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (55 reviews). Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cresta Social Share Counter and Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Elokenz – Author's Most Shared Articles" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.