Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cookies for Comments | WP Mail Logging | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Cookies for Comments | WP Mail Logging |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 18 | ★ 365 |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | 300,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Cookies for Comments edges out WP Mail Logging on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
WP Mail Logging has the larger user base (365 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Cookies for Comments's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Cookies for Comments; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP Mail Logging's 365-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cookies for Comments's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cookies for Comments audit • WP Mail Logging audit
Cookies for Comments has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 18 reviews) compared to WP Mail Logging (4.7★ from 365 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Cookies for Comments holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. WP Mail Logging has the deeper published review base (365 vs 18), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cookies for Comments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (18 reviews). WP Mail Logging typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (365 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cookies for Comments and WP Mail Logging both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Cookies for Comments" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
